Tech House Church — the evidence

Each dot is a teaching; each ring is a work that carries it. Size is how many connections it has. Colour is how many independent witnesses. Those two deliberately disagree — a big dot is well-connected, not well-attested, and telling those apart is the point. Click anything to open it. How this was built →

a reference finds every source that carries it
Show
5+ independent 4 independent 3 independent 2 independent 1 independent Witness work Bigger dot = more connections · colour = how many independent witnesses · thicker line = a more independent witness
Every place the corpus argues with itself. These are the same tensions that run through the threads, pulled out and ranked, because they are the hardest thing on this page to find and the most useful thing on it to read. Nothing here is a claim that the tradition is incoherent — only that these pairs have not been reconciled, by us or by the sources.

The arithmetic can say where a contradiction would score high — both sides well attested, sitting close in the text — but not whether one is there. The last search of that kind named 27 candidate pairs and 8 turned out to hold a real clash. The other 19 were teachings that simply sit near each other, and filling this view with them would have been the easiest possible way to make the corpus look more broken than it is.
Show at least everything
doubt one side and it goes away hard to escape
This view is interpretation, not evidence. Everything else on this page is a claim about what the sources say. This is a claim about what the teachings and the events mean together — which one illustrates another, which one only makes sense if another is true, and which ones pull against each other. None of it touches any score. Read it as an argument you are invited to disagree with. Each link has to say what new idea it brings; one that only restates its parent does not belong on the page, so brings in is the toll every level pays. The gold links are the exception in kind: an untranslated Aramaic word sitting inside a teaching is a fact about how the text was carried, not a reading of it. Which teaching it belongs with is still a judgement, which is why it lives here.

Indentation is local. A nested row relates to the row directly above it, not to the teaching at the top of the thread. Follow four levels down and you may be a long way from where you started — the graph contains paths twenty steps long, and a long path through a connected graph is a tour, not an argument. That is why threads stop at three levels here.
what follows from it what contradicts it an Aramaic word it still carries
Creative association 4
0 · the text put these together 10 · we drew it  ·  11 · coincidences
Show
Tap a teaching to open its thread.
Start from

Point at a dot to read it. Click it to open everything behind it.

Database christian-scriptures.sqlite · integrity ok Canonical score formula v1.3 · recomputable from stored evidence Open working draft · last updated 2026-09-07 No book drafted — method and database only 18 of 106 sources independently verified